Hello, it has become Sunday and time for a new podcast episode. Today we are going
to discuss one of the most fascinating and one of the most controversial voices
in the alternative history. His name is Anton Parks. He is a French-German author
born in 1967 and he claims to have direct access to our planet through
history, not through archaeological digs, not through university libraries, but through visions
and a unique ability to translate Sumerian tables into an entirely new way. In his book,
including the famous series The Chronicles of Gírkù and his translation work Eden,
Parks presents an epic narrative. Interstellar wars, reptilian gods, humanity's origins as
genetically created slaves and why we today literally are trapped in our own solar system.
Today we will dive into Parks' life, his methods, his cosmology and his claims that the Bible is the
delivery fortune. But we will also end with a critical look from Mainstreet Scholarship.
Fasten your seatbelts, grab your favorite chair and your most and your best cup of coffee because
we are embarking on a journey that starts 300,000 years back in time.
Let's start with the man himself. Anton Parks was born on January 1st, 1967. He is of French-German
origin and this is relevant because much of his early inspirational material, including the
German hobby narratives, came from the German-speaking esoteric tradition. He's often
described as a specialist of the ancient Near East. I'm not going to pronounce that in French
because everybody will be laughing, but it's important to emphasize he's a self-taught.
He holds no university degrees in Sumerology, none in Egyptology, none in archaeology. His
expertise comes from decades of personal research and what he calls visions. Just 14 years old,
Parks begins receiving intense involuntary visions. They weren't only daydreams. They
were a full century experience. Image, sound, smell, textures, all of it. He experienced
scenes from a distant past but in total disorder. alien ships, ancient backdrops
humanoid figures with snake-like features. And here's the crucial part. He was not a passive
observer. He experienced the visions through the eyes of a specific character, a person
who carries a crystal instrument called a gherko, a kind of a database. But in an interview he
described it like this. I see myself in the character's skin recording the data into the
crystals. I am completely a spectator. This is data that was recorded one day a very long time ago.
This was disturbing and at times dangerous. He could lose depth perception when it happens
while in traffic. He discovers that with a cap, with a visor, could block the light that triggers
these visions. For years he suppressed them. He tries to live a normal life including working
as a musician under the name Wolf Lincs. The crucial shift happened by chance at the
Louvre Museum. He came across a Sumerian dictionary. The words and grammar he had
heard in his visions resembled Sumerian or rather what he calls proto-Sumerian mother tongue. He
eventually decided to take his visions seriously. But to avoid being dismissed as a madman, he
invented something unusual. He used his visions as a guide to translate the ancient Sumerian texts.
He became the self-taught Sumerian logist and he swears by a large wormbook manual. Oh no, I'll try to say that again.
Manuel d'Épigraphie Akkadienne. I'm sorry for my French pronunciation. Look in the transcript if you want to have it correctly.
But Park's personal life also took a dramatic change at this cosmology. In the biography called
Le Plérôme à la Matière (2019), written with his wife, Hanael Parks, he reveals that he was
systematically exploited by psychopaths, by narcissistic perverts. He lost his original
publishing company, his rights, his home. He came near to be destroyed. His meeting with his wife
was described as a reunion of twin souls separated by millennia.
Is it really in his personal cares that this grand narrative of our audience unfolds?
Let's leave them in for now and let's enter the myth.
Park's story does not start on earth but in deep space, around 300,000 years ago.
The Sumerian gods, the Anunnaki, exist but forget Zacharias Sitchin's Nibiru.
Park is adamant there is no Sumerian tables that mentions Nibiru as the gods of the home planet.
That is an invention. Instead, Park describes it as a powerful reptilian empire and on the top of
the empire were the Kingu, a royal caste that controls everything. Below them is the Ashungu
and the Tiamata. And then there are the Anua. Park's preferred term for the Anunnaki,
a rebellion faction. The war is not about power, about rebellion against a material rule.
The Anua lost. In their fight, they became trapped in our solar system.
Park introduces a crucial distinction, Anua versus Nungal.
Anua belong to the clan of the god Enlil. They are royals.
They have green reptilian skin. They arrived on earth and established themselves as rulers.
Nungal belongs to the clan of the god Enki. They are white reptilian skin.
They are the fallen angels of the bible. They are initiators who mix with humans,
give away secrets, create hybrids offspring. Enki and Enlil are therefore not brothers.
Park reveals something shocking. Enlil is the creation of Enki, a failed cloning experiment
that Enki spared. On the top of the hierarchy, we will find an Enki's creator. Below him
lies the city of Karshak. It means city of the gods. Park locates it in the Tauros mountains
in present-day Turkey. This is where we find the Garden of Eden.
Park's translation here is radical. Eden does not mean paradise. The Sumerian word Yidim means
home of life, but Greek paradises, which the bible uses, literally means enclosures for wild animals.
For Park, the Garden of Eden is therefore a genetic control zone.
Or in modern words, a concentration camp. And the word Adam, it's Sumerian for animal or for cattle.
So why does the gods create humans?
The answer is simple if you ask Park. Labor. Their new restaurant, they needed somebody
to till the soil, tend the garden, perform slavery, basically. However,
humanity was not created from nothing. Homo erectus were already existing.
It was Enki, the chief genesis, who was tasked with improving the race.
Together with the priestesses called Ninji, the priestesses of life, he used an advanced
artificial matrices, genetic incubators, to create human sapiens.
The secret that was behind humanity was the blood of Kingu. The gods took the genes from their
defeated enemies, the Kingu, who they considered inferior, and mixed them with the earth's
bindings. The goal was to create an obedient, left-brained, easily disciplined slave.
But Enki was not a typical slave owner. Park described Enki of being too good, someone
who had too much heart, basically. His mother Namu, who worked with humanity for millennia,
she has developed immunity to human bacteria. She passed on this immunity to Enki.
In Park's translations of the CBS tablets, something happens. But the Bible omits.
Humans enter the gods' garden, they steal fruit, and they contaminate the gods
with early diseases. The gods become sick. Enki must heal them.
Because Enki is immune, he becomes the only who can communicate with humanity.
He becomes the intermediary, and he teaches them secrets.
The great secrets, the tool. Park simplifies that the Sumerian word, ish, means both tree and tool.
This is the tree of knowledge. Enki teaches humans to use tools,
first to cultivate the land, but implicitly also to defend themselves, to make weapons.
Here, there is a great parallel to the Bible. The serpent in the garden of Eden is Enki.
He is called Mosch, Serpent. He speaks to the woman, because the woman is humanity's future.
She raises the children, she transmits knowledge. But unlike the Bible, Park tells of an outright
rebellion. Armed with the new tools, humanity march up the mountains toward the city of the gods.
They will kill the gods or force them to flee. The gods react with overwhelming force and violence.
They use the flying chariots, the Ginjaan, to burn everything down. The surviving humans
were forced into slavery. And this time, they swear an oath in front of the gods' spacecraft,
that they will never rebel again. Parks believes that this oath resides in our collective
subconscious, even today. And after the defeat, Enki separates from the other gods. He travels to
Egypt. He becomes the god Osiris. His temple in the Abydos is called Apsu, Sumerian for house of water.
In Egypt, he continues his work with humanity. He teaches them agriculture,
beavering, vitriology, and so on. He actively hybridizes with humans.
And Park believes that the elongated skulls is proof of that found all over the world,
in Peru, in Egypt, in Iraq. They are not merely the result of cranial bindings.
Some of them even have larger volume than normal human skulls, up to 25 to 30 percent larger
according to Parks. This is, for Parks, a proof of generic hybridization between
humans and reptilian gods. Enki, or should I say Osiris, is eventually murdered
by his rival Seth, whom Parks identifies as Enlil.
He is crucified on a tree, killed, disremembered. His wife, Isis, resembles him.
The stories of Osiris' death and resurrections is, for Park, the direct prototype for the story of
Jesus Christ. He goes as far to claim that the word Mary, or Mary, is Egyptian for a beloved
a title for Isis. And the uref, meaning body, lies behind the Hebrew word for Joseph.
Parks' most provocative claims concern Moses. He believes that the historical Moses was Ramoses
and, oh, let me try to say that again, Akhenaten's vizier.
When Akhenaten's monastic revolution fails, Ramoses stole the sacred
archives, the Egyptians' technology, including the Jared staff that can control the elements,
and the body of Osiris. He let the people of slaves out of Egypt.
The operas sung in Egypt possibly is the origin of the word Hebrew.
So it was not a god who parted the Red Sea. It was technology.
So how did this original story become known as the Bible?
Parks reconstructs the path. He starts. First chapter, in Sumer about 2500 to 1800 year BCE.
The original tables are written. Here Enki is the serpent, Adam is an animal, the garden is a labor
camp. Second chapter, around 3000, I'll say again, 1350 BCE, Akhenaten and Moses distorts the
survey. Monotheism emerges. The Osiris cult is kept secret. Chapter three, in the Babylonian area,
which is 587 to 529 BCE. Here the Jews are deported for 58 years. They hear the Babylonian
creation myth, Enuma Elish, and the story of the god Marduk's death and resurrections.
They take the myth home with them. Chapter four, the Seppu Giand, which is from 300 to 200 BCE.
The first Greek translations of the Old Testament is created. Here the serpent
roles is changed from a teacher to Harun, the cunning one, the accused one. In chapter five,
the New Testament is around 300 to 400 CE. Here the church compiles the final versions by making
the serpent into Satan and god into Enlil. Yahweh basically swept the rules.
Humanity's true benefactor Enki becomes evil, while the oppressor Enlil becomes the good god.
So what happens to the gods? Parks believes that they are still there.
The war in space never ended. They are now lost, but the enemies, the Kinkou, won.
Parks explains that the Kinkou are not trapped in the solar system. Therefore, the moon is not a
dead rock. Parks believes that the Kinkou has spaces on the moon. He points to the creators
as evidence of an ancient wars. Mars was also like Earth once. The Anu live there in the
underground bases, and those bases are still there, according to Parks. That is why our Mars mission
systematic fails. This brings us up to the final point, that we are trapped in the solar system.
Parks says that the doors are blocked. He tells the story of the white beer,
Oswald Friedrichs and Hobie Elder. As a young man he worked in a mine in Arizona in the 1920s.
The mining company Peabody Coal was merely a front for the excavation of a top secret military base,
the Black Messiah. Here, Hobie and Navigal workers helped excavating rock, using technology
that melted stone. Technology provided by the great beings, large heads, large eyes, perhaps the Kinkou.
The workers was exposed to radiation. They died like flies. White beer survived only because
that he wore lead sweets.
Parks concludes, our story is a lie, written by the victors, the Enlil clan.
Our sub, Mrs. Neff, is the result of an old swan in front of a spacecraft, more than 300,000 years ago.
And now for the difficult part. Because mainstream scholars does not see Adam Parks as a pioneer.
They see him as a pseudo-historian. They say his work is not science, it's speculative fictions,
dressed in scientific clothing. Let's take it point by point. First point,
the Sumerian language is dead, that is not ancestral. Parks claims that the Sumerian,
the functions, is the key to Maya and Hobie. The problem is that Sumerian is a language isolated.
So that means it's not related to any other known languages, neither Indo-European,
Semitic, nor anything else. When Park uses Sumerian to decipher Merian glyphs,
he's doing something that linguistics would compare to using Danish words to understand Chinese.
Second, translations. Parks highlight words like Adam as equal to animal, that is correct. However,
he admits that the context of these words are used in perfectly ordinary ways.
Adam also means human. Eden also means steppe. So when you choose the most essential
translational meaning, that is called confirmation bias. Furthermore,
no Sumerian logist has ever found a tablet describing Enki as a green-skinned reptile.
These details come from Parks' visions, which he sees what he wants to confirm in the tablets.
That is called circular reasoning. Furthermore, Parks criticizes Sitchin's Nibiru, and he is right
that Nibiru is not mentioned as a home planet. But nowhere does it say that the gods come from
either, comes from the Pleiades. Parks believes that the gods come from Pleiades.
And this is just, in the other way, the same as Sitchin says.
The next one is the elongated skulls as known. That is a known human practice.
Parks uses the elongated skulls as evidence as hybridizations with reptiles. The mainstream
explanation is called cranial bindings. That is a well-documented practice. You literally tie
boards around an infant's head, and that changes the shape. But it does not increase the brain
capacity. Parks claims of 25 to 30 percent, a larger volume, has not been verified by
independent researchers. Furthermore, Moses, Osiris, and Jesus. Parks' identifications of
Moses with Ramos, and Jesus with Horus, are classical examples of what the religious
historians call parallelomia. That is also other words for an excessive hunt for similarities
which ignore differences. Egyptians' text never describes Horus as a savior who dies for humanity's
sins. And if you look at the Hopi traditions, Parks uses the Hopi narratives as historical
evidence. The Hopi themselves regard their oral tradition as a religious myth, not as
geographical reports. Using them as evidence for a sunken continent is a form of cultural
appropriation. The mainstream scholar's verdict is clear. Linguistic, his method is unscientific.
Archaeological, there is no physical evidence. Historical, his identification relies on
superficial similarities. Methodical, he mixes the visions and the facts without distinction.
Ethical, he uses endangered methodology outside their context.
So, what does it leave us? Does it mean that Anton Parks is worthless to read?
I say no, absolutely not. He works with an impressive modern methodology, a gigantic
self-consistent narrative that tries to make sense out of our world. He asks the big questions.
Where do we come from? Where is the evil? And are we alone? And he answers that original
and is also thought-provoking. But the reader must never forget that Parks, he is not
an historian that is uncovering the past. He is a visionary author that is constructing a past.
So, if you need to read Anton Parks, you should read his truth. But not the truth
recognized by mainstream scholars. He is a French-German autodidact. He built bridges
between ancient Sumerian tablets and modern ufology. His love story with his wife is also
beautiful. His personal struggles are real. But his cosmology remains at best, should we say,
incredible. This is an incredible story. So, the question is not if Parks are right.
The question is why his narratives appeal so strongly to all of us right now.
Thank you for listening to the podcast. And if you want to read more about Anton Parks,
you can find it at antonparks.net. It is spelled without any spaces and so on. Just
antonparks.net. So, until next time, keep your feet on the ground, and see you.